The headquarters of the GCHQ, Britain's signals intelligence agency that will help develop the military's new cyber security force. Image via Flickr.
On Sunday, the United Kingdom announced that it will
recruit “hundreds” of hackers and IT experts to build up its military’s
offensive cyber capabilities, making it the first nation to openly admit
that it plans to wage future wars in cyberspace.
In a press release,
British Defense Secretary Philip Hammond confirmed that the UK will
spend £500 million on a new hacker reserve force in order to develop
“full-spectrum military cyber capability, including a strike capability”
as a deterrent to cyber threats. The unit, Hammond said, will be at
“the cutting edge of the nation’s cyber defenses,” working alongside
traditional military forces to protect the nation’s digital
infrastructure, and launch offensive cyber attacks if necessary. In the
future, Hammond added, these clinical “cyber strikes” will supplement
conventional arms by disabling enemy planes, weapons, communications,
and other hardware.
“‘This is the new frontier of defence,” Hammond told the Daily Mail. “For
years, we have been building a defensive capability to protect
ourselves against these cyber attacks. That is no longer enough.” He
continued:
You deter people by having an offensive capability. We will build in Britain a cyber strike capability so we can strike back in cyber space against enemies who attack us, putting cyber alongside land, sea, air and space as a mainstream military activity. Our commanders can use cyber weapons alongside conventional weapons in future conflicts.
By
itself, the news that Britain is building up a digital army is not all
that shocking. It’s an open secret that most world powers—including the
US, China, Israel, and Russia—have developed offensive cyber
capabilities behind closed doors, and that the US has already launched a
cyber strike, the Stuxnet worm, to sabotage the Iranian nuclear
program. It’s not surprising that Britain, the world’s fourth-largest
military and America’s closest ally, is getting in the game.
As the 2009 McAfee Virtual Criminology Report made
clear, cyber attacks are already a reality of modern warfare, and the
importance of cyber armies is only expected to increase over the next 20
or 30 years. From the McAfee report:
Although there is no commonly accepted definition for cyber war today, we have seen
nation-states involved in varying levels of cyber conflict. Further,
while we have not yet seen a “hot” cyber war between major powers, the
efforts of nation-states to build increasingly sophisticated cyber
attack capabilities, and in some cases demonstrate a willingness to use
them, suggests that a “Cyber Cold War” may have already begun.
But
while the UK may not be breaking any new ground in cyber warfare,
Hammond’s willingness to announce Britain’s cyber strategy—and envision a
future where cyber weapons are used openly alongside conventional
arms—may be even more significant. Politically-motivated cyber threats
have so far been shrouded in secrecy, making it difficult to determine
who is behind the attacks, what their motivations might be, or what kind
of retaliation they might expect. On the one hand, this has made some
governments more cautious about launching cyber attacks. But it has also
prevented an international community from developing norms for what
constitutes a cyber threat and what constitutes a proportionate response
to a cyber attack.
Security
experts have questioned whether Britain made the right move in publicly
disclosing its cyber buildup, particularly at a moment when the
international community is in a state of heightened suspicion over the
NSA’s sweeping spying programs. “Why make plans for a cyber-strike force
public now?” British security analyst Thomas Rid asked the Financial Times. “Such aggressive statements can be counter-productive. Other actors want to react in kind, making everybody less secure.”
But
as the McAfee report points out, the cyber cold war is already
underway, and it will only escalate as more nations develop cyber
capabilities. While Britain’s announcement may make online threats more
likely in the short term, it will also provide the first test of whether
offensive cyber capabilities can serve as a deterrent measure against
future attacks. And if other countries follow Britain’s lead, it will
bring cyber security policy out into the open, aligning public debate
with the realities of modern war.
No comments:
Post a Comment